Informations et ressources scientifiques
sur le développement des zones arides et semi-arides

Accueil du site → Doctorat → Australie → 2020 → Objective truths or subjective realities : A model of social and cultural impact assessment to deliver socially, culturally, ecologically and economically sustainable development of Northern Australia

Charles Darwin University (2020)

Objective truths or subjective realities : A model of social and cultural impact assessment to deliver socially, culturally, ecologically and economically sustainable development of Northern Australia

Munday Jane Marianne

Titre : Objective truths or subjective realities : A model of social and cultural impact assessment to deliver socially, culturally, ecologically and economically sustainable development of Northern Australia

Auteur : Munday Jane Marianne

Université de soutenance : Charles Darwin University

Grade : Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) 2020

Résumé
The aim of this thesis is to contribute to better policy and practice of social and cultural impact assessment. The overarching research question is : ‘What model of social and cultural impact assessment will deliver socially, culturally, ecologically and economically sustainable development of North Australia, including the ability of Aboriginal people to determine the type, pace and scale of development on their land and seas ?’.

A multi-methods research approach includes an audit of impact assessment studies in the Northern Territory (NT) between 1974 and 2018 and 58 key informant interviews with practitioners, regulators, companies, decision-makers and Aboriginal leaders. Given the multidisciplinary nature of impact assessment, the research draws on theoretical frameworks from sociology, psychology, anthropology, economics, political science and human geography.

The thesis starts with a gap analysis of the social, cultural and participative elements of impact assessment in the NT between 1974 and 2018. It explores the dimensions of quality impact assessment, perceived gaps between the ideal and actual practice and links between a quality system and practitioners’ qualifications. It then explores key elements of a model that suits the unique context of North Australia. These elements are values mapping, participative justice and cultural competence.

Finally, the thesis outlines the forces driving and inhibiting institutionalisation of the model. Barriers include a cultural capture of impact assessment by technical scientific approaches and narrow conceptions of sustainability. The thesis concludes that impact assessment fails to meet societal, proponent or practitioners’ expectations. It is seen as costly, inefficient, culturally incompetent and as excluding the values and perspectives of those most affected by development. Social impact assessment suffers from poorly qualified practitioners, a lowly status and lack of agreed methodologies. The consequences are to divorce humans from the socio-ecological ecosystems on which they depend, and which they continue to degrade, and a failure to address a growing trust deficit in regulatory, political and business institutions.

Présentation

Version intégrale (5,6 Mb)

Page publiée le 4 novembre 2021