Informations et ressources scientifiques
sur le développement des zones arides et semi-arides

Accueil du site → Master → Pays Bas → 2011 → The dilemma of development aid in conflict areas in Afghanistan

Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences (2011)

The dilemma of development aid in conflict areas in Afghanistan

Simonides Erik J.

Titre : The dilemma of development aid in conflict areas in Afghanistan

Auteur : Simonides Erik J.

Université de soutenance : Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences

Grade : Degree of Management of Development, Specialization Rural Development and Communication 2011

Résumé
Aid doesn’t always reach those who need it. In conflict areas aid is stolen, diverted, manipulated and abused by people with power. Donors and development organizations respond by taking the aid somewhere else, to a safer place, depriving the needy or making it difficult for the target group to reach the aid.
Aid in a conflict area has much potential. Aid can alleviate direct suffering. Development aid may strengthen the war economy and conflict. Aid can help building the peace economy and build a society and aid can reduce the conflict. But the conflict makes it difficult to implement the aid. Many organizations find it too difficult and too dangerous to work in a conflict area. Other organizations accept all the negative impacts, as they find alleviation of suffering paramount important. Some organizations search for ways to implement the aid and avoid the negative impacts.
This study focussed on organisations that work or worked in conflict areas in Afghanistan. Key players in the Afghan conflicts are war-lords. Project implementers in the field are confronted with those war-lords and have to find a way to deal with them. War-lords have the means and power to make it very difficult or even impossible for aid workers to work in his area. Experience has learned war-lords do exercise this power.
Some organisations recognize the war-lord as a part of the context they work in that cannot be ignored. Ignoring or rejecting the war-lord would make him a dangerous potential enemy of the project and its staff. These organisations open the dialogue with the war-lord, to make sure he will not harm the project and sometimes even involve the war-lord in project implementation. This approach is criticised, as war-lords are generally seen as criminals, thieves and murderers that should be brought to justice and therefore not to be communicated or cooperated with.

Présentation

Version intégrale

Page publiée le 21 novembre 2022